Renters say responsible property owners are being punished for the actions of a few bad apples

The Township of Muskoka Lakes, which covers a popular part of Ontario’s cottage country, is moving one step closer to clamping down on short-term rentals like Airbnbs and VRBOs in the area.

At a public meeting Tuesday, dozens of residents shared their thoughts on a proposed bylaw that would require cottage owners to apply for a licence allowing them to rent their properties. The proposed bylaw classifies a short-term rental as a dwelling used as accommodation for 28 days or less.

For cottage owners like Todd Perry, whose family has enjoyed a lake in the area for seven decades, it’s about time something is done about short-term rentals. His family cottage is next to a property that’s frequently rented out.

“Your kids come up to you and say, ‘Dad, I don’t feel comfortable sitting on the dock because of the bachelor party that’s being held beside us,'” he said. “We have to deal with up to 12 or more people every weekend beside us. It’s like a commercial hotel. I go up there to relax.”

He said they face issues like DJs blasting music, bottles and cans rolling in the water and pets running wild.

Meanwhile, some cottage owners, and rental agencies that represent them, argue the problems with short-term rentals can largely be blamed on a few owners who don’t care about preserving peace and quiet. They say bylaws like the one being proposed could lead some owners to choose not to rent their cottages, leading to economic consequences in the region.

How would bylaw change short-term rentals?

The proposed bylaw would mean owners need to pay a $1,000 application and $500 inspection fee to receive a licence. The licences would then be subject to a demerit point system, meaning if 15 demerit points are accrued, a licence is revoked.

Property owners would also only be able to list short-term rentals for half the days in a calendar year, and between Victoria Day and Labour Day, each individual stay would need to be at least seven consecutive nights.

Muskoka Lakes Mayor Peter Kelley says that would help limit unruly behaviour, which has become more of a problem as short-term rentals have become big business. He says most renters are responsible, but some are “literally running unsupervised commercial resort hotels.”

“Renting your property here, and this is probably controversial, it’s a privilege,” Kelley said. “And in order to continue to enjoy that privilege, we expect compliance with our normal bylaws for behaviour.”

Along with licence fees and rental limitations, the drafted bylaw would also require property owners to have someone close enough to respond to complaints within an hour.

Renters say bylaw goes too far

Several locals who rent properties short-term spoke at Tuesday’s public meeting, saying they could support regulation, but the proposed bylaw punishes responsible property owners.

Cheryl MacMillan said she relies on supplementary income from renting to help cover the costs associated with her property.

The proposed seven-night minimum stay requirement, she said, would limit her business. In eight years of renting, she said she’s only had three bookings for week-long stays.

She argued the township already has the power to keep the peace.

“We do not need any new laws to manage parking, noise or waste management, as they relate to (short-term rentals)” she said. “Rather, what we need are by-law officers to enforce what already exists.”

Andy Milovanovic asked why short-term rentals were being targeted for partying and noise disturbances. Milovanovic owns a local business that rents party equipment in cottage country, and says his biggest bookings each summer are for property owners, not renters.

Jayne McCaw, owner of Jayne’s Luxury Rentals, which handles short-term rentals for property owners in Muskoka, says she’s already had multiple clients hesitate to list their cottages this year because of the licensing fees.

She thinks owners renting through companies like hers should be exempt because they are licensed to operate under the travel industry act of Ontario.

McCaw agrees with aspects of the bylaw but is worried it could impact the local economy. She said for every dollar someone spends on accommodations, they spend two dollars in the local economy.

“Say they rent for $500 a night. That means $1,000 of that extra money is not going to come into Muskoka,” she said.

But Mayor Kelley says licensing only works if all renters pay fees to cover administrative costs.

Laura Ender, who lives next to two AirBNBs, told council she supported the drafted bylaw, even if it made it harder for her neighbours to supplement their income through renting. She said they were putting their financial interests above the well-being of the community.

“Why have we allowed residential units to become commercial business entities that impact the entire community? They’re not zoned as hotels or motels but yet they function as such,” she said.

The Muskoka Lakes Association represents 2,000 cottagers in the area and vice-president Ken Pearce said the group sees both sides of the issue.

“Some of them have to rent their cottages to help with paying for the upkeep and the property taxes and to enable them to continue to own it,” he said, but that has often come at the expense of peace and quiet.

“For some people, it’s right next door to you. It can be terrible.”